Se parte un solo fischio...

[pagheca]

purtroppo non e' facile rompere il circolo vizioso che crea continui consensi al personaggio. Questo articolo di The Economist uscito ieri e' interessante, perche' parla proprio di "berlusconizzazione" dell'Italia. Va letto per intero. Economist plaude a qualche gesto, e soprattutto non e' prevenuto, cerca di guardare alle cose col distacco che si dovrebbe pretendere da un buon giornale, sebbene ovviamente la valutazione dipende dal proprio orientamento politico. Purtroppo non ho proprio tempo per tradurre, ma ho cercato di evidenziare i molti passi importanti e spero di trovare il tempo piu' tardi per farlo.

da http://www.economist.com/world/europe/d ... d=13576329

Italy and its prime minister
The Berlusconisation of Italy
Apr 30th 2009 | ROME
From The Economist print edition

The Italian prime minister seems more strongly entrenched than ever

Illustration by Peter Schrank

IF ANYBODY is having a good recession, it is the Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi. Italy is certainly suffering: the IMF expects GDP to fall by 4.4% this year, a bigger drop than in Britain, France or Spain. But Mr Berlusconi remains significantly more popular than most other European leaders. His approval rating this month, measured by IPR Marketing for La Repubblica’s website, actually rose to 56%.

Part of the explanation is that, after more than a decade of underperformance relative to the European Union, Italians are used to economic distress. And since their banks were less enterprising (or reckless) than those in America and Britain, none has collapsed so far, sparing Mr Berlusconi the politically lethal fallout from using taxpayers’ money to save the hides of rich financiers. Yet his approval rating had been slipping—until the earthquake that hit L’Aquila on April 6th.

Mr Berlusconi’s response to the earthquake seems to explain the latest uptick. He spent almost a week in the disaster zone and even offered to accommodate some survivors in his own homes. On April 23rd he went a daring step further, saying he would switch the venue of the G8 rich-country summit in July to L’Aquila, partly so as to divert funds towards the city’s reconstruction. On the same day he announced a seemingly generous €8 billion ($10 billion) in aid for the earthquake zone (it has since emerged that this will be spread over no less than 22 years).

Mr Berlusconi’s response to the earthquake highlights another factor that his supporters claim explains his poll ratings. As one minister puts it, “this is the first government since the second world war to give Italians decisive leadership of a kind that is entirely normal in Europe.” That contrasts with his previous period in power in 2001-06, when he had to deal with repeated internal revolts. Many were caused by the centrist Union of Christian Democrats, which split from the centre-right coalition before the April 2008 election that returned the right to power.

Mr Berlusconi’s present government is far more homogenous. In March its two biggest components—his own Forza Italia and the National Alliance, which grew out of the neo-fascist movement—united in a single entity, the People of Freedom. Of the two other coalition parties, only the Northern League has the parliamentary clout to bring the government down.

To Mr Berlusconi’s critics, the explanation of his popularity is quite different. It is that he is reaping the benefit of a long-term influence on the views of his compatriots that no contemporary politician can rival. Every Italian under 30 has grown to political maturity in a country where Mr Berlusconi and his family control half the television output, one of four national newspapers, one of two news magazines and the biggest publishing house.

His hold on the media has changed attitudes and even the meaning of words. When he entered politics in 1994, few gave credence to his claim to be a victim of conniving communist judges; now it is widely believed. Fifteen years ago, an azzurro represented Italy in international sporting competitions and a moderato was a centrist. Today, an azzurro is somebody who represents Mr Berlusconi in parliament; a moderato anybody who votes for him.

The subtle Berlusconisation of Italy may help to explain a trend that has swept the country in the past 12 months. It is not only that the opposition has divided and the unions are split. It is that a conviction has gripped much of society that the prime minister will stay in power indefinitely. “I have to say that I see no alternative to Silvio Berlusconi,” declared Gabriele Muccino, a film director and one of several intellectuals and artists who have recently voiced similar opinions. This is ironic in a country whose politicians spent 15 years working towards a two-party system. It augurs ill for future economic reforms, in which Mr Berlusconi has shown little interest. And it is also troubling in any democracy, especially when seen in the context of the prime minister’s own words and actions.

His new party is as undemocratic in its form as Forza Italia was. He was acclaimed, not elected, leader at a founding congress last month that empowered him to appoint the executive. Mr Berlusconi routinely denigrates the judiciary and, since returning to power, has become increasingly dismissive of the legislature as well. His government’s use of procedural devices to cut short parliamentary debate has even been criticised by his ally, Gianfranco Fini, former leader of the National Alliance and now speaker of the lower-house Chamber of Deputies. Mr Berlusconi has sought to justify this by arguing that the myriad checks and balances in the system make Italy ungovernable. But, as President Giorgio Napolitano retorted recently, such views pointed to “authoritarian solutions”. After all, the system was put in place precisely to prevent the return of a dictator like Benito Mussolini.

Few believe that there is a serious risk of reverting to those dark days. But several recent books have highlighted the extent of Mr Berlusconi’s ascendancy and asked questions about how he intends to exploit it. Massimo Giannini, author of one, argues that his aim is “not a dictatorship in the classic sense, but…a modern form of post-ideological ‘totalitarianism’”.

The most powerful reason to worry comes in Mr Berlusconi’s own words. At his new party’s inaugural congress, he reminded the 6,000 or so delegates that “sovereignty belongs to the people”. But he also claimed that his was “the only party that defines the identity of our people”. In fact, he said, “we have to be a people even more than a party”. That smacks of pure populism.

Mr Berlusconi’s supporters dismiss all such misgivings, insisting that his sole long-term objective is the presidency (albeit, perhaps, after a constitutional reform to make it more powerful). On April 25th, the day when Italians mark the 1945 Allied liberation, the prime minister offered support for the view that he aspires to lead the nation, not just the right. He took part for the first time in the celebrations. Later he withdrew a controversial bill that would have given honours and pensions to Mussolini’s diehard militia.

But Mr Berlusconi also took the opportunity to suggest that the name of the holiday should be changed. It should not be the day of liberation but of freedom. As in, for example, the People of Freedom?

[ranvit]

Il primo fischio si avvicina.....Veronica ha dato una bella botta!

[Rosario Amico Roxas]

Il fumo che si leva dal fuoco della paglia bagnata Rosario Amico Roxas

Sento nell’aria un grosso fetore di trucchi, come quando, nelle feste strapaesane, si sparano il fuochi e la gente volge lo sguardo per ammirarli … è il momento migliore per rapinare qualche appartamento, o far fuori l’avversario di turno profittando del frastuono dei fuochi.
Ora il can-can sul fatto privato e sulle confessioni della traditissima Veronica, sta attirando l’attenzione popolare, con particolare riferimento agli aficionados di questa novella versione del Grande Fratello. Chi sia nella cruda realtà il cavaliere non doveva dircelo nessuno, bastava guardare senza prosciutto negli occhi; per questo non accettiamo che sia questa melensa telenovela a metterci quel prosciutto per nasconderci altre delinquenziali manovre.
Il fatto in sé è troppo banale, scontato perfino, ed il clamore non rispecchia la dimensione dei due attori che, molto probabilmente stanno recitando un copione già scritto; ma a che pro ???
Starei molto attento, perché il fumo che si è levato dal fuoco di questa “paglia bagnata”, potrebbe servire per nascondere ben altro… non c’è affatto da fidarsi.

[ranvit]

Si stiamo sempre in campana, l'uomo è capace di mille e mille diavolerie....ma non facciamo neanche come il vecchio Pci che, amante delle dietrologie e prigioniero delle lunghe e sofferte analisi su ogni cosa (anche sul sesso degli angeli), arrivava sempre 10 o 20 anni dopo alle conclusioni, ovvie, degli altri.

Vittorio